- California Assembly OKs highest minimum wage in nation
- S. Korea unveils first graphic cigarette warnings
- US joins with South Korea, Japan in bid to deter North Korea
- LPGA golfer Chun In-gee finally back in action
- S. Korea won’t be top seed in final World Cup qualification round
- US men’s soccer misses 2nd straight Olympics
- US back on track in qualifying with 4-0 win over Guatemala
- High-intensity workout injuries spawn cottage industry
- CDC expands range of Zika mosquitoes into parts of Northeast
- Who knew? ‘The Walking Dead’ is helping families connect
Rubio decries ‘dictators’ in N.K., Russia, Iran, accuses China of ‘stealing’ its way to superpower status
U.S. Secretary of State nominee Marco Rubio on Wednesday accused “rough states” and “dictators” in North Korea, Russia and Iran of sowing “chaos” and “instability,” and China of having “lied, cheated and stolen” its way into a global superpower status at the expense of the United States.
During a confirmation hearing at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the Florida senator emphasized his commitment to incoming President Donald Trump’s America First agenda, saying placing the interest of America and Americans “above all else” has never been “more relevant or more necessary” than it is at present.
In November, Trump nominated Rubio as his top diplomat — a post facing a full plate of foreign policy challenges, including an intensifying rivalry with China, Russia’s war in Ukraine and North Korea’s evolving security threats to name a few.
“In Moscow, in Tehran, in Pyongyang, dictators and rogue states now sow chaos and instability, and align with and they fund radical terror groups, and they hide behind their veto power at the U.N. Security Council or the threats of nuclear war,” he said in his opening statement.
On China, the nominee showed his hard-line stance, adding to speculation that Sino-U.S. tensions would deepen during the second Trump administration.
“We welcomed the Chinese Communist Party into the global order, and they took advantage of all of its benefits and they ignored all of its obligations and responsibilities,” he said.
“Instead, they have lied, cheated, hacked and stolen their way into global superpower status, and they have done so at our expense and at the expense of the people of their own country.”
Touching on the Taiwan issue, the nominee raised concerns over the possibility of China invading the self-governing island democracy, which Beijing claims as part of its territory under a one-China principle.
“I think we need to wrap our head around the fact that unless something dramatic changes, like an equilibrium, where they conclude that the costs of intervening in Taiwan are too high, we’re going to have to deal with this before the end of this decade.”
On the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Rubio pointed out that NATO member states are ‘rich’ and should contribute more to their defense.
Trump has said NATO states should spend 5 percent of gross domestic product on defense — much higher than the current 2 percent guideline of the alliance. The demand has raised the prospects of the incoming president asking South Korea and other allies to increase their security contributions.
“I think there’s been broad acknowledgement across Europe and across multiple administrations, both Republican and Democrat, that our NATO partners … these are rich, advanced economies, need to contribute more to their own defense and ultimately to the NATO partnership as well,” he said.
He went on to say that what matters is for the U.S. not just to have defense allies, but to have “capable” allies that are able to defend their region.
Still, he underscored the importance of the transatlantic alliance, calling it “very important” and “very useful.”
Rubio showed his negative view on the postwar global order, under which he believes countries have manipulated to serve their interest at the expense of America.
“The postwar global order is not just obsolete; it is now a weapon being used against us,” he said. “And all this has led us to a moment in which we must now confront the single greatest risk of geopolitical instability and generational global crisis in the lifetime of anyone alive here today.”