(LEAD) Choo slams top prosecutor for ‘crossing line,’ announces inspection of Optimus probe

October 26, 2020

The gaping political rift between Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae and Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-youl widened further Monday, as the minister accused the top prosecutor of overstepping his bounds during a parliamentary audit of the Supreme Prosecutors Office held last week.

“For the prosecutor general who must maintain political neutrality, I believe some of his statements crossed the line. As a person in the supervisory position, I’m embarrassed,” said Choo during a parliamentary audit of the justice ministry held at the National Assembly.

Last week, Choo ordered the top prosecutor to recuse himself from the investigation into the high-profile financial fraud case surrounding Lime Asset Management, citing a failure on the part of Yoon to conduct a thorough investigation into opposition politicians and prosecutors allegedly implicated in the case.

Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae attends an annual parliamentary audit of her office at the National Assembly in Seoul on Oct. 26, 2020. (Yonhap)
Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae (L) speaks during an annual parliamentary audit of her office at the National Assembly in Seoul on Oct. 26, 2020. (Yonhap)
This file photo shows Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-youl speaking during an annual parliamentary audit of the Supreme Prosecutors Office at the National Assembly in Seoul on Oct. 22, 2020. (Yonhap)

Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae attends an annual parliamentary audit of her office at the National Assembly in Seoul on Oct. 26, 2020. (Yonhap)

Yoon instantly accepted the order but described it as “illegal” and “absurd” during a parliamentary audit session Thursday. He also claimed that President Moon Jae-in asked him to serve out his term via an “appropriate messenger” despite pressure from the ruling bloc for him to resign.

“I believe it was inappropriate for a senior official to make such an unsubstantiated statement on the occasion (of a parliamentary audit),” Choo commented.

Lime Asset, founded in 2012, has been under a probe over its alleged cover-up of massive losses and subsequent suspension of fund redemption worth an estimated 1.6 trillion won (US$1.39 billion).

Choo also announced a plan to review whether the Seoul Central District Prosecutors Office under Yoon’s leadership in the past properly handled the explosive financial scam case surrounding separate large-scale fraud by Optimus Asset Management.

“Since it is a type of pyramid financial scam, all that was really required was the tracing of bank accounts. (The district office) seems to have not done that,” she said.

The Optimus scandal centers on allegations that the private equity company solicited funds worth about 1.2 trillion won from about 2,900 investors for investments in public institutions but actually funneled most of the money into risky assets, causing huge losses to the investors.

The Lime and Optimus cases are at the center of what could develop into a large political lobbying scandal, with allegations flying around that the equity firms illegally lobbied former and sitting ranking officials and politicians to cover up cases and evade investigations.

“The Optimus case was almost buried by prosecutors but was barely salvaged by lawsuits of ordinary citizens,” Choo said.

The minister also reiterated that she was legally entitled to revoke Yoon of his supervisory authority in the Lime case and a separate case involving his family.

“I was briefed (on the cases) for three days through an internal inspection, which proved the validity and the need (for the minister) to directly command the cases,” Choo said.

The prosecution is also currently looking into allegations that Yoon’s wife was involved in manipulating stocks in Deutsch Motors and that her art exhibition company took bribes disguised as donations.

The ongoing clash between the administration and the prosecution has transpired largely from last year following controversial investigations into former Justice Minister Cho Kuk, a key architect of Moon’s drive for prosecution reform, and his family.

Reform of the prosecution has been a key agenda of the Moon administration amid long-held public views that the state prosecution has wielded excessive power without adequate checks and balances.